Translate

Monday, March 4, 2013

Chaucer's Canterbury Tales
Manuscript Study
Melissa Townsend-Crow
San Jose State University
Prof. Elizabeth Wrenn-Estes
LIBR 280-12
March 7, 2013




Table of Contents

Introduction
History and Provenance
Context  
Author and Scribe
Composition
·         Writing Support and Size
·         Collation and how was it put together: rulings, page, or leaf layout
·         Binding 
·         Inks/Pigments
·         Decorations, Illumination, and Photo(s)
o   All images are from the Huntington Catalog Database, Huntington Library.  Digital Publishing Group ©2002
·         Incipit
·         Explicit
·         Colophon
·         Script(s) or type of writing
Summary
Reference Page(s)

 

Introduction


The Canterbury Tales is a collection of stories written in Middle English verse, the vernacular of the time and   Geoffrey Chaucer was among the first poets/writers to create works in the language of the people instead of the Latin of the Church or the French of the court . Chaucer started the ambitious work around 1387 and it is unfinished. The premise of the Tales is that a group of pilgrims on their way to Canterbury would take turns telling stories to their fellow travelers. He had originally planned for there to be 120 tales, but finished only 24 before his death in 1400, but even incomplete, this piece establishes Chaucer's reputation as the premier English poet of his time and for some time to come. Over a century and a half later, Edmund Spenser tried to emulate him in his Faerie Queen.  There are eighty-three surviving manuscripts and fragments of  the Canterbury Tales, and of these, the Ellesmere Chaucer (MS EL 26 C 9) which is located at the Huntington Library in San Marino, CA  is the most complete. It is approximately 16 inches by 11 inches there are 240 leaves of calfskin vellum, including 8 flyleaves. an extravagance which leads experts such as Herbert Schulz to infer that this manuscript was commissioned as a "de luxe" edition (Schulz p. 55).

The Ellesmere Chaucer in its 1995 binding


History and Provenance


The provenance of the Ellesmere manuscript, is related by Herbert C. Schulz (2004 pp. 46- ) who was the curator of manuscripts from 1940 to 1971 at the Huntington Library which houses the manuscript. It is uncertain who first commissioned the manuscript, although there is some conjecture that it was Chaucer's son, Thomas because of the care taken in its completeness, including tales not found in other copies (i.e., the Yeoman's Tale) and the style of the illumination (p. 46). The first known owner is believed to be John De Vere, twelfth Earl of Oxford. A poem found on some of the flyleafs point to the De Vere family and when his father died, John was fostered by the Dukes of Bedford and Exeter, who were related to Thomas Chaucer.
According to Schulz, presuming that the 12th Earl of Oxford possessed the manuscript, it would have passed to the 13th  Earl, who was also called John De Vere and was the second son, by inheritance. The 13th Earl of Oxford died without issue and the manuscript is believed to have passed to Sir Robert Drury by way of his son-in-law, Sir Giles Alington who was the Earl's ward. There is an inscription on of the flyleafs (fig1) noting Drury's ownership.

             From Drury, the manuscript was passed to Henry Payne and Henry Payne bequeathed the manuscript back to the Drury family in his will, specifically Sir Robert Drury's great-grandson, Sir Giles Alington, grandson of Sir Robert's daughter. According to Schulz, "This (the will) is the first reference from sources outside of the manuscript itself relating to ownership of the Ellesmere Chaucer" (p. 48)



ownership poem on flyleaf

The manuscript was next in the possession of the Egerton family, earls of Bridgewater as evidenced by writing on the first flyleaf in the manuscript in the handwriting of the first earl whose father was titled "Baron of Ellesmere" under Elizabeth I. His son, Sir Thomas, was the founder of the Bridgewater Library. This is where the manuscript remained, though the library itself and its contents passed through many other hands until Henry Huntington bought the  entire lot in 1917 through the auction house of Sotheby & Co.
The Ellesmere Chaucer is currently off display (much to the disappointment of this writer) because, as the placard in the display case stated, manuscripts must, every 18 months,  be closed for a time to preserve the spine. Furthermore, the Huntington is renovating the Main Exhibition Hall where the rare manuscripts are usually displayed. In the meantime, a replica of the Ellesmere Chaucer, created by the Huntington in 1995, is on display in its stead (Schulz pp. 60-61).

Context


The Canterbury Tales  by Geoffrey Chaucer is an anthology with a frame involving pilgrims on their way to the shrine of the martyr Thomas à Becket in Canterbury cathedral. Chaucer lived in interesting times. He was born during the Hundred Years War between England and France and was once held for ransom by the French – which Edward III paid, a sum of 16£, which was a quite a bit at that time.
The threat of Plague, the "Black Death,"  was still raging throughout Europe, with the death toll peaking around the middle of the century. In fact, Queen Phillipa, wife of Edward tIII and Blanche, Duchess of Lancaster and the first wife of John of Gaunt (the third son of Edward III and future husband of Chaucer's sister-in-law, Katherine de Roet-Swynford) succumbed to bubonic plague. John of Gaunt commissioned a poem from Chaucer, an elegy to his late wife, called "The Book of the Duchess."
The Church was a strong influence on every aspect of medieval life. One has only to look at the great cathedrals and imagine the energy and resources it took to erect them to see that, however, not everyone was complacent with the theocratic rule and the abuses of agents of the Roman Catholic Church. Lollardy was a heretical movement founded by John Wycliffe and it agherents questioned the absolute authority of the Pope and the Church, although other religious doctrines were accepted. To be a Lollard was punishable by death, (this was despite the fact that, although not a member of the movement himself, one of the strongest defenders of the Lollards was John of Gaunt), and was one of the factors that led to the Peasants' Revolt in 1381 (the other being a poll tax instituted by John of Gaunt to help pay for the Hundred Years War with France which made him one of the most disliked men in the land, despite his defense of religious freedom). Dissatisfaction with the abuses of the church, or certain agents of the church, is also evident in the work of William Langland, a contemporary of Chaucer who wrote the poem Piers Plowman in which agents of the church are portrayed as greedy villains, using their religious authority to gain worldly goods and power. Similarly, Chaucer's character the Pardoner in The Canterbury Tales confesses liking money while preaching that the root of all evil is this love of money and he also confesses to "selling" pardons and fake relics.
Chaucer's use of the vernacular Middle English in his works had an impact on those who followed. Although the language of the royal court was still French (despite the ongoing war against France, it would seem) and Latin the language of the Church and the educated among the population, works such as The Canterbury Tales were created for those who spoke the language in which they were written and, it may even be conjectured, helped raise the literacy rate amongst  a more plebian population.

Author and Scribe

Author
Sir Arthur Ward, a professor of history at Oxford and Cambridge and biographer of Geoffrey Chaucer writes, "The biography of Geoffrey Chaucer is no longer a mixture of unsifted facts, and of more or less hazardous conjectures" (Ward p. 2. Kindle Edition) .  Chaucer was the son of a vintner and himself, a civil servant in the employ of the Plantagenet King, Edward III. Clearly, Chaucer was well-educated and his wife, Phillipa de Roet, daughter of a Flemish Knight, was a lady in waiting to the queen. Phillipa's sister, Katherine de Roet, was married to Hugh Swynford, a knight in the king's service. Later, after Katherine was widowed, she became the governess to the children of John of Gaunt and his wife Blanche, Duke and Duchess of Lancaster. After Blanche died of plague, Katherine became Gaunt's mistress, and eventually his third wife and bore him four children who were the ancestors of the House of Tudor. When the queen died, Philippa Chaucer went on to the service of Constance of Castile, John of Gaunt's second wife. In other words, Chaucer was rather well connected and thus, his name appears in official records, including one in  which it was recorded that Edward III paid 16£ ransom when Chaucer was taken prisoner by the French while in the employ of Lady Elizabeth, wife Lionel of Antwerp, in whose retinue he was when he was captured on a march to a battle at  Rheims in 1360. Clearly, Geoffrey Chaucer was a valuable member of the royal staff and held many positions of service to the Crown during his lifetime including that of comptroller of customs, member of parliament, clerk of the kings works, and deputy forester. He also was employed as an ambassador of goodwill. In this capacity, Chaucer visited Italy and the influence of these journeys is evident in both "The Clerk's Tale" and also in his poem, "Legend of Good Women."
He was sponsored by Edward III and later by Richard II. Although Richard was overthrown the new king, Henry IV renewed the pension granted to Chaucer by Richard until Chaucer's death, usually believed to be October 25, 1400, although there are no official records like a death certificate to show this, merely the inscription on his tomb, erected one hundred years after his death. Chaucer was the first to be buried in what is known as "Poets' Corner" at Westminster Abbey
Scribe
The allowance income he received from the crown probably allowed Chaucer to concentrate on his literary works in his earlier days, in particular, The Canterbury Tales (Davis, pp 129-130).  He was, for example, able to employ scriveners or scribes to copy his works. The Ellesmere Chaucer as well as the Hengwert manuscript, the two most complete and authoritative copies of the Canterbury Tales,  are believed to have been copied by the same scribe who has now been identified as Adam Pinkhurst or "Pynkhurst"  by Linne Mooney. Mooney writes, " recent scholarship suggesting that Hengwrt, and perhaps Ellesmere as well, was prepared during Chaucer's lifetime, and therefore possibly under his supervision," (p. 1). The Huntington dates the Ellesmere manuscript from 1405-1410 which is a few years after Chaucer is believed to have died, though no one knows the exact date.
Records show that Adam Pinkhurst was a freelance scribe who belonged to the Scriveners' Guild in London and did freelance work for  Mercer's Company as well as being a wrier of letters of Court, a position similar to that of modern day notaries (p. 109). Pinkhurst was identified as the probable scribe of the Chaucer manuscripts by his indiosyncratic signature and oath. Mooney writes,

MS 5370 in the Guildhall Library in London is the Scriveners' Company Common Paper, in which new members from ca. 1391-92 onwards signed an oath of loyalty to the company, together with their signatures and notarial marks if they were imperial notaries.  On page 56, entered in 1392 or thereabouts, are the oath and signature of "Adam Pynkhurst," whose handwriting in both oath and signature reveals their writer by characteristic idiosyncrasies as the scribe of the Hengwrt and Ellesmere manuscripts of Chaucer's Canterbury Tales. The hand  of Pinkhurst's oath in the Common Paper is unmistakably that of the Hengwrt/ Ellesmere scribe (pp. 99-100).

The Ellesmere Chaucer is written in the hand of one scribe, now believed to be the "Adam Scriveyn," poetically chastised by Chaucer in a poem:

Chauciers Wordes, a Geffrey vnto Adame his owen scryveyne:
Adam scryveyne if euer it thee byfalle
Boece or Troylus for to wryten nuwe,
Vnder thy long lokkes thowe most haue the scalle
But affter my makyng thowe wryte more truwe,
So offt adaye I mot thy werk renuwe
It to corect and eke to rubbe and scrape,
And al is thorugh thy necglygence and rape.

Although he scolded the scribe for mistakes on other works, it is generally believed that Chaucer employed Pinkhurst to work on the Canterbury Tales before his death. One of the reasons for this belief is that Pinkhurst writes in his own voice and in  the ink of the final draft at the end of the unfinished Cook's Tale, "Of this Cokes tale maked Chaucer na moore," (Mooney, p. 105). 

Manuscript Composition

Herbert Schulz (2004, pp. 52-56). describes the composition of the manuscript as follows: 
*      232 vellum leaves, measuring 15.75 inches by 11.125 inches; the writing space is 12.325 inches by 6.125 inches
*      The largest calfskins measured about two feet by three feet after they had been prepared for use. Such a skin would have made four leaves (or eight pages). Thus the Ellesmere manuscript took at least fifty-eight of the largest skins.
*      ruled in pink ink in single columns, composing 48 lines for text
*      there are 8 ruled flyleaves, four at the beginning of the book and four at the end
*      there are 29 quires, trimmed
*      line prickings are intact and appear to have been made through all eight leaves of each quire
On the occasion of its disbanding and rebinding in 1995, the conservators doing this work took the opportunity to examine the manuscript in great detail.  
Writing Support
The Ellesmere Chaucer was written on vellum, probably calfskin. There is an unusual crease or fold in the parchment, probably caused by being folded by the parchmenter for storing (Cains, p.129).  See fig.1 below:

Fig1 The position of the crease visible throughout the manuscript suggests an original fold by the parchmenter (into halves or quarters), and a possible offcut (shown above).
Although the manuscript has been rebound at least twice, remnants of the original binding remain and indicate that the cover was of white tawed leather, probably sheepskin, and dyed red. It is not certain what kind of wood served as the cover boards, though evidence of wood worm infestation is present, it does not indicate the species of wood. Verdigris staining indicates that copper clasps had been used. 

Inks and Pigments

The text ink is reddish brown and was written before the decorations were added. 

example of grotesque decoration in the Ellesmere manuscript
 The decorations are made by at least three artists and their use of pigments and style show different levels of skill. According to Cains, " Comparing the pigments suggested different techniques and perhaps different levels of skill among those who decorated, illustrated, and gilded the manuscript. The work of the illustrators appears technically less accomplished than that of the decorator and gilder" (p. 129).

Catalog of some of the inks and pigments (from Cains):

*      text ink:   transparent organic brown
*      ink used for ruling:  transparent medium stained pink by an organic crimson pigment (from madder, kermes, or orchil)
*      blue (decoration):  aquamarine/lapis lazuli either pure pigment or mixed with an inert white
*      orange-red pigment:   red lead (darkened when overpainted on to the ultramarine and oxidized in some areas to brown)
*      white:  chalk (inferred from the stability and transparency of the pigment)
*      opaque yellow pigment (Portrait of the Pardoner):  orpiment
*      carbon black
*      brown-black asphaltum,
*      verdigris (green)
*      folium or turnsole (red-purple)
*      gold leaf and gilding prepared on gesso

Illustrations


Twenty-three portraits of the Pilgrims illustrate the manuscript . Style differences and levels of skill in the rendering point to at least three artists. For example, one of the artists would paint the Pilgrim and horse on a field of grass. According to Schulz (p. 36), "Quite apart from the paintings of the Pilgrims, the Ellesmere Chaucer is the most elaborately decorated of the Canterbury Tales." Borders fill the left margins of the pages and are augmented by elaborately drawn and filled colorful initials.




Incipit and Excipit


There is an incipit and an excipit between each tale. For example, here is the page where the Wife of Bath's Tale begins:

note the calligraphy announcing the end of the Wife's Prologue and the beginning of her tale – Adam Pinkhurst was known for the inconsistent sizes of his writing, which may be why Chaucer wrote the poem chastising him


There is no colophon that I could discover. Instead, a succession of owners wrote their names on the flyleaves. The Scribe, now believed to be Adam Pinkhurst, left his unique signature in his idiosyncratic way of writing, a style for which he was, perhaps, humorously chastised by Chaucer himself. Schulz notes that,

The scribe was a skilled writer but had a pronounced tendency, when he interrupted his copying at intervals … then to resume his task with a rather abrupt  change in the size of letters, the shade of ink, ot the bite of his pen nib.

His script is a form of English cursive called "anglicana formata" (Schulz p. 55).

Summary


Geoffrey Chaucer is frequently touted as the man who brought literature to the people because he wrote in the vernacular of the day, although this writer must confess that it is sometimes difficult to imagine a time when almost everyone spoke Middle English. Scholars have since disputed that Chaucer was that influential, that the trend for English authors to write in their own language was already in progress with Wycliff's Bible translation,  John Gower, and William Langland all writing in the vernacular of that time and place.
What Chaucer has done, perhaps all unknowing, in the Canterbury Tales and especially in this beautiful manuscript, is he has allowed those of us in the 21st century to step back in time. We can read his words to this day and hear the voices of his pilgrims, telling their stories. We can peek in the 15th century through this work created so long ago. If indeed, as some conjecture, Geoffrey and Phillipa's son, Thomas Chaucer commissioned this beautiful work of art, it is a fitting tribute to the immortality of "the well of English undefiled, On Fame's eternal beadroll worthy to be filed," as Edmund Spenser said of him. Indeed, this manuscript seems to speak of immortality, not only of Chaucer's words, but of books and words and stories over all.